MyMason's Case Studies

 Fireplace Case Studies

    Nakkertok Fireplace Surrounds

    Two-Ton Chimney Supported, Fireplace Rebuild

    Fireplace Surround - Wood Burning Insert Installed

    Fireplace Fire Brick Replacement

    Fireplace Surround - Natural Stone

    Electric, Natural Stone Fireplace

    Fireplace Hearth Replacement

    Stone Fireplace

    Cultured Stone Fireplace & New Framing

    Cultured Stone Fireplace Surround

    TV Mounted on Stone Fireplace

    Restructuring Fireplace: Wood to Gas

    Drywall to Stone Fireplace

    3-sided fireplace: Cultured Stone

    Fireplace Removal, Damper Removal

 Chimneys and Brickwork Case Studies

    Chimney Repair

    Chimney Repair, Articulated Boom

    Custom Scaffold, Chimney Repair

    Lower-Chimney's Removal, Wall Restructuring

    Chimney Flue Replacement

    Concrete Chimney Cap as per Building Code

    Chimney - Sloped Side, Repair

    Chimney - Wobbly Chimney

    Brick Pillar

    Brick Garage Pillar Repair

    Window's Lintel Installation

    Brick Sill Creates Wall Damage

    Brick-to-Stone Window Sill Replacement

    Brick Retaining Wall Rebuild

 Stone Work Case Studies

    Stone Wall Rebuild

    Granite Resurfacing of Concrete Stairs

    Stone Step Rebuild

    Stone Stair Rebuild - in Winter

    Stone replaces Brick Door Sill

    Stone Retaining Wall Rebuild

    Dry-Stack Retaining Wall Rebuild

    Dry-Stack Stone Retaining Wall

    Flagstone Patio Rebuild, Expansion

    FlagStone Step Repair

    Stone Replacement

    New Interlocking Stone Walkway

    Re-setting Interlocking Walkway

    Tile Installation

 Algonquin College/MyMason Case Studies

    Cold Weather Masonry Rules

    3 New Cases Studies in 2015

    Salt and Concrete Testing

    Concrete Curing Stress Tests

    Concrete and Rebar Stress Tests

 Parging Case Studies

    Parging, Cement Board

    Parging Examples & Techniques

 Concrete Case Studies

    Broken Concrete Step

    Basement Window, Concrete Cut

    Basement Window, Concrete cut-out

    Concrete Walkway, Landing

    Concrete Stairs and Landing

    Concrete Stairs and Landing

    Concrete Countertop




    Case Study:
        De-Icers, Salt, Concrete and Cement Testing

        Before and After


The Assignment:
    Working with Algonquin College
    measure the effect of various salts
    on different cements and concretes


The Testing Tools
These machines will test the compression strength of the cements.
The Masonry Lab is located within the Algonquin College School of Construction Excellence.

The Forms
Three samples of each strength of cement will be created for each type of salt.

The cylinders hold concrete mixed to 32 and 20 MPA strengths (foundation and sidewalk strengths)
The cubes hold N type and S type, both used with brickwork, with S type twice as strong as N.
The water bath helps in the curing process. After the bath they are left indoors for more than 30 days.


Soaking in De-Icers
A control set of cements will not be subject to salts, but will be wetted and kept outdoors.

Each bin contains a different de-icer, using: Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium and Calcium Chlorides.
A mixture of 2.5 quarts of de-icer with 11 quarts of water fill each bin, but can't prevent some freezing.


Rinsed with Water, Freezing
At frequent intervals the cements are removed from their solutions and rinsed.
They are then left wet to freeze outside of the solution. Always shielded from the wind.
First Cracks
The N type cement, weakest of our samples, is already cracking within the second week.
After only one exposure to the 4 different de-icers, cracks are forming in the N type cement.
Handling the Samples
The team is adding salt, fresh water, and moving the samples back into the solution.
L - R: Philip, Thomas, David, with Eric in foreground.

The materials are all kept in a locked dumpster on the grounds of Algonquin College.

Windchill: -34
The day started with windchill of -39, so it's warming up.

L - R: Philip, David, Eric, and MyMason's John Ernst

Early Concrete Degradation
The concrete in cylinder form, much stronger than the N and S cement cubes, is also flaking and cracking.

The 20 MPa concrete can handle about 3000 pounds per square inch, while the 32 MPa concrete handles almost 5000 psi using less water in the mix.

20 MPa is cited as normal for pathways, footings, driveways... What strength would you want?

A Warm Day
With temperatures above 10 degrees in late January, the solutions have no slush.

You can see evidence of the cubes breaking apart. Lifting them out, the N types do fail.

This is after just two weeks of rotation between salt baths and rinsing.

The S Type Begins to Fail
These cubes have been subjected to Rock Salt, which is least able to melt ice of the four de-icers we're using.

The Freeze Cycle
Here we lay the samples on top of their respective de-icer bins, pouring water on them to freeze them.

Usually two days later we will come to insert these frozen pieces into the de-icing solutions.

The N Type Fails
There won't be N type cubes to crush later on, except for our control pieces which haven't been subjected to de-icers, just freesing water.

The Tests Continued
The team of students and their Professors, with MyMason's John Ernst, continued the tests for nearly three weeks, due to the imminent failure of the samples. We had planned to test for three months.

Then all the samples were brought inside and crushed by the compression machines to measure their strength.

The Final Report
This PDF document, prepared by the Algonquin College team, shows how de-icers do cause damage to cement and concrete.

The take-home lessons are:
reduce the number of freeze-thaw cycles your concrete endures,
reduce the amount of water soaking into the concrete,
avoid using any type of de-icer, as it recrystalizes inside.

Use sand to increase the lifespan of your concrete.

Table of Results, 32 MPA Concrete
From the Report here is a table showing the break points of concrete normally used in sidewalks and patios, after being subjected to four kinds of salt on and off for 3 weeks.

The bottom line result isn't so much the difference between de-icers but how not using salt or any de-icer is good for your concrete.

De-icers cause freeze-thaw events and those are hard on cement and concrete.

Failing Concrete
Just 3 weeks of freeze-thaw cycles were required to cause this concrete to fail under-strength.

This page last modified: April 2013